Re: SGI CRASH WHEN CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET

From: Wei Li <wli_at_utmem.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:08:36 -0500

Hi Weixing,

You can try to connect the console on ec1 and connect the internet on ec0.
When I was CPU/4 upgrading my ARX to be controlled by SGI O2/Xwinnmr 2.6
back in 1999, Bruker book suggested that spect must be on ec0, otherwise the
connection to the spect might be lost. However, SGI crashes very often. At
the beginning I thought it was the problem with SGI, so we swapped virtually
every components inside SGI but still no success. Finally, I just swapped
the ethernet cable, putting spect on ec1 and internet on ec0, changed the
configuration files----- it only crashed once due to someting else during
the past four years.

Good luck

Wei Li, Ph.D
-------------------------------------------
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Memphis, TN 38163

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Zhang, Weixing" <Weixing.Zhang_at_stjude.org>
> To: "AMMRL (E-mail)" <ammrl_at_chemnmr.colorado.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 3:42 PM
> Subject: SGI CRASH WHEN CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET


> Hello:
>
> The SGI O2 (IRIX 6.5, xwinnmr 3.5) often crashes when it is connected to the
> internet. If it is not connected to the internet, everything is OK.
> The ethernet for network connection is ec1.
> The ethernet for BRUKER NMR console (spect) is ec0.
>
> > I have checked the /var/adm/SYSLOG file for error messages
> and found the following (repeating) error messages:
>
> > Jul 29 07:02:37 1A:chamlang unix: |$(0xc4)ALERT: ec1: need more ecf_max_rxds (7)
> > Jul 29 07:27:19 4A:chamlang unix: |$(0xc3)WARNING: ec1: statistics overflow
> > Jul 29 07:27:19 4A:chamlang last message repeated 4 times
> .....................
> > Oct 6 20:46:05 1A:chamlang unix: |$(0xc4)ALERT: ec1: need more ecf_max_rxds (2)
> > Oct 6 20:52:39 4A:chamlang unix: |$(0xc3)WARNING: ec1: statistics overflow
> > Oct 6 20:52:39 4A:chamlang last message repeated 4 times
> >
> > What should we do?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Weixing Zhang,
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 10 2003 - 07:45:11 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Jun 07 2023 - 16:49:22 MST