-- Hsin Wang, Ph.D. NMR Facility Manager College of Staten Island 2800 Victory Boulevard Staten Island, NY 10314 Phone: 718-982-3809 Fax: 718-982-3910 Email: wang_at_mail.csi.cuny.edu -----Original Message----- From: schraml_at_icpf.cas.cz [mailto:schraml_at_icpf.cas.cz] Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 3:58 AM To: ammrl_at_ammrl.org Subject: RE: Removing Background signal for Si-29 NMR The solution suggested by Pichumani Kumar is good if you have couplings to employ for polarization transfer though the optimization of the delays is a not trivial task depending on the number of coupled and equivalent protons.(See Blechta V., Schraml J.: Product operator formalism applied to large spin systems (INEPT and DEPT examples). J. Magn. Reson. 69, 293 (1986). and references therein) If you cannot use polarization transfer and your spectral lines are narrow (relative to the quartz line) use spin-echo to suppress the broad line. If the lines you are interested in are also broad, you have to resort to subtracting the signal of the tube (and probe!!!) recorded in a separate measurements. Sincerely, Jan Schraml ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > From: Fauzi Mohd Som, Dr [mailto:fauzi_at_lgm.gov.my] > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 10:44 AM > To: ammrl_at_ammrl.org > Subject: Removing Background signal for Si-29 NMR I wonder if anyone can provide me a suggestion on how to remove the background signal of the quartz NMR tube when I do Si-29 liquid state NMR. Best regards, Fauzi Mohd Som (Dr.) Malaysian Rubber Board --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 11-Aug-04Received on Fri Aug 20 2004 - 14:28:37 MST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Jun 08 2023 - 18:36:24 MST