Re: AMMRL:Water suppression problem in TROSY

From: Youlin Xia <Youlin.Xia_at_mail.uh.edu>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:23:08 -0500

Try to change the last section of TROSY to 3919.

Youlin Xia
UH

----- Original Message -----
From: "Zhang, Weixing" <Weixing.Zhang_at_STJUDE.ORG>
Date: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 1:34 pm
Subject: AMMRL:Water suppression problem in TROSY
To: "'ammrl_at_ammrl.org'" <ammrl_at_ammrl.org>
Cc: "Kriwacki, Richard" <Richard.Kriwacki_at_STJUDE.ORG>, "Royappa, Grace" <Grace.Royappa_at_STJUDE.ORG>


    <font style="font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; background-color: rgb(245, 248, 240); font-size: 14px;">> </font>AMMRL: TOPSPIN 2.0 Errors <!-- /* Font Definitions */ _at_font-face {font-family:SimSun; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;} _at_font-face {font-family:SimSun; panose-1:2 1 6 0 3 1 1 1 1 1;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:blue; text-decoration:underline;} p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText {margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Courier New";} p {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0in; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} span.EmailStyle19 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:Arial; color:navy;} span.EmailStyle20 {mso-style-type:personal; font-family:Arial; color:navy;} span.EmailStyle21 {mso-style-type:personal-reply; font-family:Arial; color:navy;} _at_page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 77.95pt 1.0in 77.95pt;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} --> -----------------------------------------------------------
|

 
> Hello:
>  
> Recently, we often have water suppression problem in TROSY experiment.
> We can get good water suppression initially (the first increment), but the water peak gradually increases as t1 evolution increases.
> We tried to adjust the gradient strength during t1 evolution (to reduce radiation damping), but there is not much difference.
>  
> The problem was initially noticed after we did CryoPlatform annual service.
> I do not think this is related to the CryoPlatform service, but I could not figure out what caused this problem
>  
> Any suggestion is appreciated!
>  
> Thanks,
> Weixing Zhang
>
 -----------------------------------------------------------
> Email Disclaimer: www.stjude.org/emaildisclaimer
   |
-----------------------------------------------------------
  
Received on Wed Apr 07 2010 - 09:24:44 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Fri Jun 16 2023 - 16:46:53 MST