Am 14.11.2025 um 17:53 schrieb Angelis, Anna De via groups.io <adeangel=ucsd.edu_at_groups.io>:
Hello.
Our shielded 500 Oxford was de-energized in San Diego, moved across the country and re-energized seamlessly by Dr Feng Qui of NMRqualytics. Everything went very well, the old magnet is now in use, and with new o-rings the Helium retention time is like new.Best,Anna De Angelis (Salk/UCSD)
On Nov 14, 2025, at 7:46 AM, Albers, Thomas via groups.io <talbers=nmhu.edu_at_groups.io> wrote:
In my experience, 60 MHz or 80 MHz benchtop instruments are extremely useful for sparse, sensitive nuclei, like 31P or 19F, where the sensitivity penalty can be tolerated and second-order coupling does not matter.
Observing a 13C spectrum can be lengthy, and interpretation of 1H can be complex.
Thomas
From: main_at_ammrl.groups.io <main_at_ammrl.groups.io> on behalf of Anjaneyulu Putta via groups.io <anjaneyuluputta=boisestate.edu_at_groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 1:39 PM
To: main_at_ammrl.groups.io <main_at_ammrl.groups.io>
Subject: [AMMRL] Approximate cost estimation to bring down Bruker 300 or 600 MHz NMR temporarilyÂHello NMR community,ÂDue to budget constrains, we are exploring the options of temporary shutdown of our Bruker 300 or 600 MHz nmr. Could you please share the contact information of vendors to get a price quote to De-energize Bruker 300 or 600 nmrs. What will be the typical cost to Decommission and Recommission after few years for these Magnets.ÂÂIs benchtop nmrs good enough for academic labs involving experiments with multi-nuclei(1H, 2H, 13C and 31P) and what are the practical drawbacks associated with benchtop nmrs. What is the cost for the benchtop nmr (80 MHz) and any maintenance costs associated with the benchtop.ÂThank you.
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Onl=
ine (#2995) |
Reply to Group
| Rep=
ly to Sender
|
Mute This Topic
| New Topic
Your Subscription |
Contact Group Owner |
On Nov 14, 2025, at 7:46 AM, Albers, Thom= as via groups.io <talbers=nmhu.edu_at_groups.io> wrote:
In my experience, 60 MHz or 80 M= Hz benchtop instruments are extremely useful for sparse, sensitive nuclei, = like 31P or 19F, where the sensitivity penalty can be tolerated and second-= order coupling does not matter.
Observing a 13C spectrum can be = lengthy, and interpretation of 1H can be complex.
Thomas
From: main_at_ammrl.groups.io &= lt;main_at_ammrl.groups.io> on behalf of Anjaneyulu Putta via groups.io <= ;anjaneyuluputta=boisestate.edu_at_groups.io>
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 1:39 PM
To: main_at_ammrl.groups.io <main_at_ammrl.groups.io>
Subject: [AMMRL] Approximate cost estimation to bring down Bruker 30= 0 or 600 MHz NMR temporarilyÂNMHU-IT Warning: This email originated from outside of= the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recogn= ize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello NMR community,ÂDue to budget constrains, we are exploring the options of temporary sh= utdown of our Bruker 300 or 600 MHz nmr. Could you please share the contact= information of vendors to get a price quote to De-energize Bruker 300 or 6= 00 nmrs. What will be the typical cost to Decommission and Recommission after few years for these Magnets.= ÂÂIs benchtop nmrs good enough for academic labs involving experiments w= ith multi-nuclei(1H, 2H, 13C and 31P) and what are the practical drawbacks = associated with benchtop nmrs. What is the cost for the benchtop nmr (80 MH= z) and any maintenance costs associated with the benchtop.ÂThank you.
You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Rep=
ly Online (#2994) |
Reply to Group
| Reply to Se=
nder
|
Mute This T=
opic
| New Topic
Your Subscription |
Contact Group Owner |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Mon Dec 01 2025 - 17:39:38 MST