Re: AMMRL: D1 for quaternary/carbonyl carbons?

From: avik mazumder <avik.drde_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 17:02:11 +0530

Dear Dr Mark
The Quat and carbonyl carbons are often difficult to acquire with good s/n.
You can try the "udeft" pulse program. I tried it and it gives really good
results over the traditional zip or zgig sequences.

I suppose this is a part of the standard Bruker pulse program library now.
If you have any problem I can send you mine...

I think this will take care of the long pulse repetition delays.

Best wishes

Avik
On 12 Mar 2015 23:22, "Mark Swanson" <mark94131_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Everyone,
>
> I would like to get a consensus for how long people typically set their D1
> delay to detect quaternary and/or carbonyl carbons. Our default at 500 MHz
> is 1s for 13C and the quaternary/carbonyl carbons are often weak. I tell
> students they have to increase the D1 delay but I give them vague answers
> for exactly how long it should be, 5s, 10s, 30s, 1 min? Without measuring
> the T1s I don't have an exact answer to give them and "trial and error"
> tends to waste a lot of instrument time. Sorry if this seems trivial but I
> would be interested in knowing what my colleagues recommend.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark Swanson
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 14 2015 - 01:32:16 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Mon Jun 19 2023 - 15:52:27 MST