RE: Phaes correction in shape pulse calibration

From: S W Simon Sham <ssham44_at_uab.edu>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 11:16:47 -0600

Hi,

I have recieved a lot of suggestions regarding the phase correction
parameter "phcor" in "selzg" program. After posting the problem to the
group, I tried the same experiment in our 600 machine using xwinnmr 3.5
patchlevel 0 and the pulse sequence would take the value in phcor1. In
our 500 machine it uses xwinnmr 3.5 patchlevel 6.0, and the pulse
sequence would not take the phase correction value.

I found the following email which is related to this problem may be
helpful:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
Have you tried to use the negative value of your estimated phase
correction for shaped pulses?
When I worked at the ETH Zuerich and we got a test version of XWINNMR
3.5 we found that all phase corrections for shaped pulses have to be
corrected by 360degree - phase correction. BRUKER promised to correct
this.

With regards

Christian S.


Dr. Christian Schorn
GlaxoSmithKline
Analytical Sciences,
NMR Spectroscopy, Tonbridge
phone 01732 372509
building 06, desk 06/1104E
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------
Received on Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:39:58 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thu Jun 08 2023 - 17:08:04 MST