AMMRL: - summary:: experience with Bruker "flip-up" narrow bore solids probes

From: <Andrew.J.Edwards_at_gsk.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:39:38 +0100

Dear colleagues,

I have been asked to post a summary of the responses that I have received
on the reliability of Bruker standard bore ssNMR probes with a flip-up
stator. Firstly, thanks to the many people who kindly shared their
experience.

Overall, the experience of the modern (ca<8 years) probes in the field is
positive, but older probes seem to have had more problems with angle
stability.
The angle stability between sample inserts/ejects appears good, whereas
most users would recommend re-checking the angle after the probe had been
taken out of the magnet and re-inserted. The actual responses are shown
below, with attribution in cases where the contributor has explicitly
agreed for me to include their name.

I hope you find this as useful as I have,

Kind regards

Andy Edwards




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Hi Andrew,

We have several of the "flip-up" stator type probes from Bruker.
In general they work very well and are completely stable.

I have found that over time (and after frequent sample changes) that
sometimes a rotor may get "stuck" when trying to eject. I believe that
this is due to a tiny buildup of debris that accumulates from so many
samples being introduced and removed. Only one of our probes ever
displays this behaviour, and it is infrequent.

After a probe change, I find that it is worthwhile to check that magic
angle. But this has more to do with the possibility that the micrometer
was moved during handling than the probe stator design. Once the magic
angle is set, then samples can be changed many times and the stator is
maintained at the magic angle.

In general, I am quite please with the "flip-up" stator equipped probes.

Cheers,
Bob.



-- 
Dr. Bob Berno
Manager - McMaster NMR Facility
Department of Chemistry
McMaster University
1280 Main St. W
Hamilton, ON
L8S 4M1
Phone: 905-525-9140 ext. 24158 or 24686
FAX: 905-522-2509
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Brian Cherry" <Brian.R.Cherry_at_asu.edu> 
28-Jul-2008 17:30
Hi Andy,
 
I?m an used to work for Bruker primarily focusing in solids service and 
applications.  Given that my words could be biased, but I do feel so.  In 
addition to my 3 years at Bruker, I extensively used a narrow bore 4 mm 
solids probe with a flip type stator.    I found them to be rather robust, 
as long as one understood the design and it?s potential limitations. 
 
First, which model of probe do you have?  Is this a new Bio-solids H/C/N 
probe or one of the broadband HX probes?  The new HCN is slight better 
with angle setting.  Both probes use a screw to set the magic angle.  When 
the stator is flipped there is a chance that the screw will release 
tension and change the set point, thus effecting the angle setting.  To 
avoid this, always make your final adjustment in the direction that screws 
the magic angle set screw out.  This method reduces the chance for the set 
point to slip when the stator is cycled. 
 
And time the probe is removed from the magnet, I would verify the angle 
adjustment.  If the probe was handled carefully then the angle could still 
be fine or very close.  But I would always re check it.  Also, after 
initial adjustment I would cycle the stator, you can remove the eject gas 
line so the sample shoot up and down everytime, this is save you time. 
Once you?ve cycled set the angle a time or tow it will be reproducible.
 
Hope this helps.
 
Brian
Arizona State University
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Andy,
I have used Bruker narrow-bore MAS probes on a 500 and 600 for several
years. I find them extremely sturdy. Even the magic angle doesn't change
any bit after several flip ups and downs.
The only trouble is that it is very easy to mess up the stator if you open
the probe and do anything with the stator.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Andy, 
I have a lot of experience with Bruker MAS probes, both wide bore and 
standard bore.  I was a Solid State NMR Applications Scientist for Bruker 
(USA) for 6 years.  One of my current instruments (new in 2004) is a 
Bruker500 standard bore (SB) with a 4 mm MAS probe.  This has the 
flip-type stator that is common to the SBMAS and HRMAS probes.  Prior to 
working at Bruker, I had more than 10 years' experience with Chemagnetics 
and Doty probes in wide bore systems.   
With my Chemag/Doty background I was particularly skeptical of the 
flip-type stator.  I personally tested many SB probes in the course of my 
work at Bruker.  I looked for and did find problems with particular probes 
(especially with angle instability) and to my great surprise the problems 
were fixable. 
My current 4 mm SB MAS probe has worked extremely well.   I use it on 
average about one 24-hour period per month.  I run in automation using a 
solids sample changer (end MAS rate 14 kHz-- limited by my particular 
samples) and MAS-II unit and it performs reliably.  The magic angle 
setting is fine every time I check it.   
***Note, specifically----  By that I mean, after running 24 hours' worth 
of samples in automation and then storing the probe in a cabinet for 
weeks, I install the probe and do not have to adjust the angle.  That is 
stable.   
Insertion/ejection work well with the sample changer.  I set up all the 
samples, come back the next day to a pile of processed spectra and my 
rotors waiting to be cleaned.  This ain't grad-school SSNMR! 
Having said that, like anything else you buy, you could get unlucky with a 
particular purchase.  Also note that it has to be installed and set up 
correctly in order to work properly.  Make sure that your probe is robust 
if you buy it.  Do not be shy about negotiating your own specs right into 
the contract before you agree to purchase. 
I would insist (in contract) on the following very simple test to be 
demostrated on the new probe in my system with my equipment: 
Step 1.  Insert a rotor packed with KBr (or other angle-test sample of 
your choice), spin it up to about 5 kHz, adjust the angle if necessary and 
measure the spectrum.  Then spin it up in 5 kHz increments to the maximum 
specified MAS rate and observe the stability of the spinning rate to make 
sure it's in spec.  Measure a spectrum at the highest MAS rate, if 
desired, and then drop the MAS rate down to 5 kHz or wherever you started 
and measure your spectrum again.  Compare the spectrum carefully to the 
first one measured.  Does the angle require adjustment?  If it does, the 
probe needs to be repaired and should not be accepted.  If the angle does 
not need adjustment, eject the rotor and go to Step 2. 
Step 2.  Insert the sample again, spin up to the test rate, then measure 
the spectrum.  Do not make any adjustments to the angle setting!  Eject 
the sample. 
Step 3.  Repeat Step 2 at least 10 more times, preferably between other 
samples.  If you want, add a step for removing and reinstalling the probe, 
but this is not so important.  It's very important to eject and insert the 
rotor between tests. 
Step 4.  Compare all the spectra measured:  the envelope of the spinning 
sideband pattern should be constant.  The magic angle should be stable. In 
a properly installed and working Bruker SBMAS probe it will be stable. If 
it's not stable, you will have spectral evidence of the instability. 
Good luck! 
With best regards,
Kelly
Kelly L. Moran, Ph. D.
Staff Scientist
Ashland Inc.
Global Technology
Analytical Services & Technology
http://www.ashlandanalytical.com
5200 Blazer Parkway
Dublin, OH 43017   USA
614-790-3936
614-790-4294 (fax)
KLMoran_at_Ashland.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Andy,
 
   I have found that the reproducibility of this type of stator is very 
good. I would set mine after installation in the magnet and it would be 
correct for a series of experiment. If I had the probe in for an extended 
period I would just check it every few days, with a KBr/ Adamantane mix 
sample.  These observations pertain to Hr-MAS and CPMAS probes of the 4mm 
variety in narrow bore system
 
You could give me a call if you feel you need more info
 
650.467.8692
 
 
Regards
 
Steve Huhn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
25-Jul-2008 14:03
I have had a Bruker narrow-bore solids probe for over 8 years.  It has 
been very stable and reliable.  Although I check it each time I install 
the probe, it  generally requires little or no adjustment of the magic 
angle.  In the past I would check it if I ran multiple samples, but I now 
have confidence in its stability.  I have never had a problem with 
insertion and ejection of the samples.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
25-Jul-2008 13:46
Andy - I think that this may depend upon the vintage of the probe.  We 
have used an older probe (~ 10years old) and to be honest it wasn't the 
best.  However, with samples like 3-methyl glutaric acid as a setup sample 
(carbonyl linewidth <15Hz on a 400) it is trivial to verify the angle 
after each probe change.  My concern is the flip between samples.  Our 
probe was OK (not as good as a fixed wide bore) but acceptable for 
analysis of organic crystalline systems. Where we had problems was with 
decoupler efficiency.  The older narrow bore probes couldn't handle the 
high power as well and changed performance over time.  My understanding is 
that the newer probes are quite good though.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Andrew,
 
we have been using standard bore 4mm and 3.2mm probes at 750 and 900MHz 
instruments for a while. Our overall experience with MA stability was 
quite good. However, it pays off to be careful: you set magic angle on 
KBr, flip the stator back and forth, check and, if necessary, reset MA 
till you get reproducible results. Then, you should be ok. I measure MA by 
(first sideband)/centerband ratio on KBr at 5kHz spinning frq. The maximum 
ratio is about 15%, you can get reprodicible 12-13% ratio with a standard 
bore stator. It's enough for C(O). If you run VT experiments, be aware, 
magic angle setting changes for several hrs till it stabilizes and you 
need to reset MA at low temperature.
 
Long term and short term performance of high field standard bore probe 
could be better. So far, we have not been able to achieve fields beyond 
90-95kHz on 1H channel and 40-50kHz on 15N/13C channels. Sometimes the 
probes start arcing immediately, sometimes it takes them 1-3 weeks to 
start arcing. One 4mm HCN probe has been functioning ok for several months 
(at power levels mentioned above).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Hi Andy, 
  
We have a 4mm HX MAS probe for a narrow-bore magnet and a 2.5mm HX MAS 
probe. I swap back and forth between these probes each week and by default 
run KBr to set the magic angle each time. The 2.5mm probe is fixed at the 
magic angle and remains remarkable consistent, with my tweaking of the 
magic angle simply confirming that nothing has changed. As the stator is 
fixed this is perhaps not a surprise. The 4mm probe flips the stator from 
vertical(to accept a sample) to the magic angle to run an experiment, then 
back to the vertical position to eject the sample. The magic angle is not 
retained as accurately over many sample changes compared to the 2.5mm 
probe, however, the error is not large and excellent CP-MAS data can be 
recorded for long experiments(days) and for many short experiments with 
many sample changes. More demanding sequences such as ST-MAS that require 
an exact angle will suffer. We run KBr regularly just to reset the magic 
angle, it is quick, simple and serves as proof that the probe was 
correctly setup. 
  
Variable angle spinning is possible with these probes which allows the 
reintroduce dipolar couplings and CSA, which can be useful in certain 
applications. 
  
I have used probes that need to be removed from the magnet for each sample 
change and this usually involved moving the tuning rods. I found these 
probes far less convenient to use. 
 
The 1990s vintage probes from Bruker were occasionally "variable-angle" - 
drifting away from the magic angle during the same experiment, however, 
our new 4mm probe arrived here in 2005 and is robust and holds the magic 
angle reliably over many sample changes for our CP-MAS work.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 We've had our HR-MAS probe for ~8-9 years now and not had any problems 
with it. To be honest, it doesn't get a great deal of use these days 
(since we stopped doing solid-phase chemistry) and I don't think its been 
in the magnet for about a year so I can't comment on heavy sample changing 
performance but when we have put it in it has worked pretty well "straight 
out of the box". The biggest factor in how well it holds at the magic 
angle seems to be how careful you are not to catch the adjusting vernier 
when taking/putting the probe from/into the box - and its very easy to 
catch it.
 
Hope this helps & let me know if I can be of any further assistance
Best Regards 
Ian 
Ian Marshall C.Chem. M.R.S.C. 
Principal Spectroscopist, Selcia Ltd. 
Tel +44 (0)1277 367017 
Fax +44 (0)1277 367099 
ian.marshall_at_selcia.com 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To my excperience (3 years, Bruker  Avance, 4 mm NB BB probe) the angle 
does change in an unpredictable way, so it is advisable to check it 
after each probe change.
However normally I do not check it at each new sample. Otherwise the 
probe perfoms fairly well, the biggest problems are the rotor crashes, 
be careful with high density samples.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Cheers, 
Andy
-----------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
(registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a 
member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The 
registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited 
is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tue Aug 19 2008 - 03:42:42 MST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Jun 14 2023 - 15:15:08 MST